i prefer MTT but s'n'g are much easier to earn some money

I agree with Pikepl

The trouble with mtt is you might be playing for 3 to 4 hours and not make any money.

In the same time you can play 30 sng.

AAndreia posted
The trouble with mtt is you might be playing for 3 to 4 hours and not make any money.

In the same time you can play 30 sng.

But when you lose mtt, you lose just 1 buy-in, and when you play 30 sng's while being unlucky/tilted/in bad shape/whatever, you may lose loads of money.

Both mtt's and sng's have their own advantages and disatvantages imho, it's just the matter of choice.

I know but i can´t do the volume of games that sng allows.

I usually do a mix of the 2. A few sng tables and 1 or 2 mtt tables.

sit n goes pay 30 percent mtt pay 10 percent , it just depents on what u want to play do you enjoy one more than the other

That's also something people need to understand.

Yeah but 10% in mtt's is more people than 30% in sng.n

Yeah but you need to survive and that's not so easy.

i play stt for make money and mtt for fun

I usualy play sng's I have a target profit for the day and if I am above that then I'll use the extra for MTT's

so u find ur strategy a little different for s-n-gs them mtt\s

Regular 9 or 10 sit&go are the more profitable for small bankroll, avoid the turbos.

if tou stick with sngs to get your br up
and use a % of bankroll rule for mtt you cant go wronge
i use a 1% of br rule

tournaments , but it depends on Room

I like both. I like freerolls to get starting bankrolls